Experimental Designs
There are three basic
experimental designs
Independent measures (or group) design If two groups in an experiment consist of different individuals then this is an
independent measures design.
For example, if we are trying to discover if girls are less
aggressive than boys, then we obviously need 2 separate groups, namely
boys and girls. An independent measures
design has an advantage resulting from the different participants used in
each condition - there is no problem with order effects (order effects are
described below). However,
the design also has disadvantages. The
most serious is the potential for error resulting from individual
differences between the groups of participants taking part in the
different conditions. Also if participants are in short supply, then an independent
groups design may represent an uneconomic use of those available to
participate, since twice as many participants are needed to obtain the
same amount of data as would be required in a two-condition repeated
measures design. Repeated measures design Sometimes,
however we can use the same individuals and test them on 2 or more
separate occasions. Suppose,
for example, we want to find out if people react more quickly to an
auditory stimulus (like a bell) or to a visual stimulus (like a light).
We can use the same participants and try them out with both types
of stimulus. This is called a
repeated measures design and is
often more accurate than the independent measures design. However, it introduces other confounding variables which we
must be careful to control; namely practice
effects or fatigue (these are
called order effects). Suppose
the participants in the above example were all asked to react as quickly
as possible to a light, it may be because they were unfamiliar with the
procedure and they were quicker with the bell simply because they had practice. On the other hand, if they were quicker with the light it may
be because they had become tired
or bored by the time the
second lot of trials were held. In order to control the effects of fatigue/boredom and practice
we would give half the participants the light condition first, then the
bell and reverse the order for the other half.
This is known as counterbalancing. The key advantage of the
repeated measures design is that individual differences between
participants are removed as a potential confounding variable (you may
recall that this was a major drawback of the independent measures design).
Also the repeated measures design requires fewer participants,
since data for all conditions derive from the same group of participants. The design also has its
disadvantages. The range of
potential uses is smaller than for the independent groups design.
For example, it simply is not possible to use two different reading
schemes to teach young children to read within the same group of children.
Only an independent groups design could be employed.
There is a potential disadvantage resulting from order effects,
although as has been noted already these order effects can be minimised. Matched pairs design If
we cannot use a repeated measures design it is sometimes possible to match
every subject in one group with a very similar person in the other group.
In order to get the pairing precise enough, it is common to get one
group of participants together and then look round for partners for
everyone. Participants can be
matched on variables which are considered to be relevant to the experiment
in question. For example,
pairs of participants might be matched for age, gender and their scores
from intelligence or personality tests. Although this design
combines the key benefits of both an independent and repeated measures
design, achieving matched pairs of participants is a difficult and time consuming task which may be too costly to
undertake. Successful use of
a matched pairs design is heavily dependent on the use of reliable and
valid procedures for pre-testing participants to obtain matched the pairs.
Allocation of
participants in three different experimental designs 1. The independent
measures design Participants (Ps) may be
allocated to the conditions randomly.
For example:
2 Repeated measures design Each participant
undertakes all conditions of the experiment.
For example:
3. Matched pairs design Pairs of participants are
matched on appropriate variables relevant to the experiment; the members
of each pair are then allocated to each condition (sometimes randomly).
For example :
Test yourself on this matching quiz and this one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||